Car in garden following St John's crash

DAMAGE: Damaged car which was involved in the crash. Picture by Lydia Johnson

DAMAGE: Damaged car which was involved in the crash. Picture by Lydia Johnson

First published in News
Last updated

A  car landed in a resident's garden after a three-car crash in Worcester.

A West Mercia Police spokesman confirmed officers were called out to Bromwich Road, St John's, at 17.36.

On arrival, officers found a car in the garden and the other town on the pavement and road.

The three cars involved were a blue Mine Cooper, a silver Citroen and a black Renault Megane.

Police say the Mini Cooper hit the Citroen  before entering the resident's garden.

An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital as precautionary measures.

Comments (11)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

6:58pm Fri 1 Aug 14

DarrenM says...

"On arrival, officers found a car in the garden and another on the pavement."

The spirit of Sherlock Holmes lives on......
"On arrival, officers found a car in the garden and another on the pavement." The spirit of Sherlock Holmes lives on...... DarrenM
  • Score: 7

7:21pm Fri 1 Aug 14

CJH says...

"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it? CJH
  • Score: -10

7:27pm Fri 1 Aug 14

reflector says...

CJH wrote:
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button!
[quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: "An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?[/p][/quote]The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button! reflector
  • Score: 42

7:33pm Fri 1 Aug 14

CJH says...

reflector wrote:
CJH wrote:
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button!
Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.
[quote][p][bold]reflector[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: "An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?[/p][/quote]The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button![/p][/quote]Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves. CJH
  • Score: -19

11:40pm Fri 1 Aug 14

Gillian1961 says...

CJH wrote:
reflector wrote:
CJH wrote:
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button!
Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.
Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa
[quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]reflector[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: "An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?[/p][/quote]The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button![/p][/quote]Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.[/p][/quote]Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa Gillian1961
  • Score: -11

11:48pm Fri 1 Aug 14

CJH says...

Gillian1961 wrote:
CJH wrote:
reflector wrote:
CJH wrote:
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button!
Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.
Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa
Aww, still jealous Gillian? You have to let that go now... :-)
[quote][p][bold]Gillian1961[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]reflector[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: "An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?[/p][/quote]The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button![/p][/quote]Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.[/p][/quote]Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa[/p][/quote]Aww, still jealous Gillian? You have to let that go now... :-) CJH
  • Score: -7

10:11am Sat 2 Aug 14

it700x says...

It's a shame that the cars weren't traveling faster and knocked some houses down. St John's is an embarrassment to Worcester.
It's a shame that the cars weren't traveling faster and knocked some houses down. St John's is an embarrassment to Worcester. it700x
  • Score: -16

11:08am Sat 2 Aug 14

liketoknow says...

it700x wrote:
It's a shame that the cars weren't traveling faster and knocked some houses down. St John's is an embarrassment to Worcester.
what's the matter with St John's?
[quote][p][bold]it700x[/bold] wrote: It's a shame that the cars weren't traveling faster and knocked some houses down. St John's is an embarrassment to Worcester.[/p][/quote]what's the matter with St John's? liketoknow
  • Score: 1

11:31am Sat 2 Aug 14

CJH says...

liketoknow wrote:
it700x wrote:
It's a shame that the cars weren't traveling faster and knocked some houses down. St John's is an embarrassment to Worcester.
what's the matter with St John's?
Nothing wrong with St Johns. The question should be what's wrong with it700x. Many, many things obviously.
[quote][p][bold]liketoknow[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]it700x[/bold] wrote: It's a shame that the cars weren't traveling faster and knocked some houses down. St John's is an embarrassment to Worcester.[/p][/quote]what's the matter with St John's?[/p][/quote]Nothing wrong with St Johns. The question should be what's wrong with it700x. Many, many things obviously. CJH
  • Score: -2

4:29pm Sat 2 Aug 14

Doesitmakesense?? says...

CJH wrote:
Gillian1961 wrote:
CJH wrote:
reflector wrote:
CJH wrote:
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button!
Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.
Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa
Aww, still jealous Gillian? You have to let that go now... :-)
How trivial you are being CJH - 2 people were taken to hospital and you try to score points over WN reporting - I hope the people in the car who were injured are ok - that's what really matters here.
[quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Gillian1961[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]reflector[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: "An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?[/p][/quote]The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button![/p][/quote]Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.[/p][/quote]Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa[/p][/quote]Aww, still jealous Gillian? You have to let that go now... :-)[/p][/quote]How trivial you are being CJH - 2 people were taken to hospital and you try to score points over WN reporting - I hope the people in the car who were injured are ok - that's what really matters here. Doesitmakesense??
  • Score: 9

4:41pm Sat 2 Aug 14

CJH says...

Doesitmakesense?? wrote:
CJH wrote:
Gillian1961 wrote:
CJH wrote:
reflector wrote:
CJH wrote:
"An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?
The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button!
Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.
Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa
Aww, still jealous Gillian? You have to let that go now... :-)
How trivial you are being CJH - 2 people were taken to hospital and you try to score points over WN reporting - I hope the people in the car who were injured are ok - that's what really matters here.
Just because I've disagreed with you on other stories (as have other people) there is no need to make this personal. We'll never agree, so let's leave it at that. To do otherwise would be undignified.
[quote][p][bold]Doesitmakesense??[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]Gillian1961[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]reflector[/bold] wrote: [quote][p][bold]CJH[/bold] wrote: "An officer at the scene confirmed two of the drivers have been taken to hospital." Two of the drivers? How many drivers were there for two cars? Does no-one at the WN read what they've written before posting it?[/p][/quote]The report does refer to it being a THREE car crash. Sounds like the WN staff are not the only ones who should read what they have written before pressing the post button![/p][/quote]Yes, fair enough, but it only mentions two cars in the report - one in the garden, one on the pavement. The third not mentioned. Pedantic? Yes, but honestly I've had enough of WN dodgy reporting today. They've excelled themselves.[/p][/quote]Witch skool were u head misstress of o sorry u were the head of mensa[/p][/quote]Aww, still jealous Gillian? You have to let that go now... :-)[/p][/quote]How trivial you are being CJH - 2 people were taken to hospital and you try to score points over WN reporting - I hope the people in the car who were injured are ok - that's what really matters here.[/p][/quote]Just because I've disagreed with you on other stories (as have other people) there is no need to make this personal. We'll never agree, so let's leave it at that. To do otherwise would be undignified. CJH
  • Score: -12

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree